Eyes Ever Opening - Speling Reform [entries|archive|tags|friends|userinfo]
The Madwoman of Menotomy
[ website | neitherday.com ]
[ journey | spirituality, madness, travel]
[ opinion | politics, psychiatry, religion, polls]
[ read | poetry, stream]
[ see | the madwoman, art, photography]
[ hear | voice posts]
[ free stuff | backgrounds, icons, mood themes, wallpapers]

Speling Reform

neitherday
Date and Time  - Oct. 13th, 2006, 03:02 pm

Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
Current Mood  - mellow mellow
Current Music  - budgies in conference

The ferst time I was in Egypt a simplified speling epidemic had broeken out and the atmosfeer was electric with feeling enjenderd bi the subject. This was about fiev thouzand yeers ago. The simplifiers had rizen in revolt agenst the hieroglifics. An uncl of Cadmus hoo was out of a job had cum to Egypt and was trieing to introdoos the Phonecian alfabet and get it adopted insted of the hieroglifics. The Simplifiers wer fue, the Opozishun wer multituedinus. Amung the Simplifiers wer meny men of lerning and distinkshun, maenly litererry men and members of colej facultys, but all ranks and condishuns of men and all graeds of intelect, scolarship, and ignorans wer reprezented bi the Opozishun. Uncl Cadmus began an object leson, with chauk, on a cupl of blakbords. On wun of them he roet in hieroglifics: "At this time the King pozest of cavalry 214,580 men and 222,631 horses, of infantry 84,946 men, 37,264 transportaeshun carts, 321 elefants, and 28,954 camels." It fild the bord and reqierd twenty-six minits of time. Then he repeeted it on anuther blakbord in Italian script and Arabic noomerals and did it in wun minit and a qorter. Then he sed, "Mi argument is befor U. Wun of the objecshuns of the hieroglifics is that it takes the brietest puepil nien yeers to get the forms and thair meenings bi hart; it takes the rest of the naeshun all thair daes to accomplish it -- it is a lief sentens. If you wil renouns the hieroglifics and adopt riten werds insted, a tremendus advantej wil be gaend. Bi U? No, not bi U. U hav spent yur lievz in mastering the hieroglifics, and to U thae ar simpl, and the efect plezant to the ie, and eeven buetiful. But I apeel to U in behaf of jeneraeshuns yet to cum. Let yur suns and dauters adopt the riten werds and the alfabet, and thus saev milyons of yeers of uesles time and laebor." The Opozishun roez and combated his reezoning in the uezhual wae. Thoez peepl sed thae had long bin acustomd to hieroglifics and had deer and saecred memorys about them, that thae luvd to sit on a barrel under an umbrela in the brilyant sun of Egypt and spel out the rabits and eegls and aligaetors and sawteeth, and taek an our and a haf to the Lord's Prair, and weep with roemantic emoeshun at the thaut that thae had, at moest, but aet or ten yeers between themselvs and the graev for the enjoyment of this extasy.

    â€”Mark Twain


I'm qikly becuming enamord with SoundSpel. Thair ar meny reezons for wonting to reform the speling of English, frum maeking it eezyer for maeking the tranzishun to English eezyer to lern for imigrants and uther non naetiv speekers to maeking literasy skils mor nacheral for naetiv speekers.

It wuud allso help solv a frustraeting ishoo I, and meny uthers, offen cum acros: thair ar meny werds I am qiet familyar with in print but hav no iedeea how to pronouns. Having red it meny tiems but never having herd it properly pronounst, I fiend it dificult to uez thees werds in oral conversaeshun. Speekers of langgwejes such as Spanish or German do not hav this problem and with a reformd sistem such as SoundSpel, English speekers wuudn't eether.

For sumwun uezd to the oeld speling sistem, SoundSpel is prity eezy to lern to reed but a task to lern to riet. Becauz of the readability of SoundSpel; laebels, siens, and public docuements cuud to be qikly chaenjd to SoundSpel without cauz much in the wae of confuezhun.

I am serten that no amount of nujing and cajoeling cuud sucseed in geting sum peepl to swich oever to SoundSpel. But, as pointed out bi Twain, this isn't for the curent jeneraeshun but of the jeneraeshuns yet to cum. The chaenj cuud be handld in a jeneraeshunal wae. Children cuud be taut to riet SoundSpel, but be instructed on how to reed the oelder spelings until thoes spelings becum obsoleet.

Taeking the leed in speling reform wuud be a huej advantej for the Uenieted Staets. It wuud esenshaly enshrien American English as standard. However, I do hav seerius douts that a cuntry that veeemently rezists adopting metric wuud undertaek sumthing as braezen as speling reform.

The American Literasy Counsil offers free sofftwair that wil automaticaly translaet standard English speling to SoundSpel (Microsoft Werd is reqierd). It is a bit bugy and I do fiend it anoiing that the proegram consistently drops the "e" frum "the", which isn't standard SoundSpel. The problem is eezily fixt with a serch and replaes. It maeks a fue uthere errors as wel, and eeven tho the rezults must stil be proofred it stil saevs time and increeses acuerasy for thoes nue to SoundSpel like mieself. In fact, I uezd it to prepare this poest. Perhaps I shuud practis rieting longger strings in SoundSpel.

Poll #844112
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

Whut do U think of SoundSpel? (0 = "Pleez no! It herts, maek it stop!"; 10 = "Wun of th best iedeeas ever, we shuud all swich oever imeedyetly")

View Answers
Mean: 1.24 Median: 0 Std. Dev 2.41
0 26 (70.3%)
1 2 (5.4%)
2 2 (5.4%)
3 2 (5.4%)
4 1 (2.7%)
5 0 (0.0%)
6 0 (0.0%)
7 3 (8.1%)
8 0 (0.0%)
9 1 (2.7%)
10 0 (0.0%)


LinkLeave a comment

Comments:
[User Picture]
From:[info]drownophelia
Date:October 13th, 2006 - 07:37 pm
(Link)
as a lover of the english language, i haven't seen anything uglier in my entire life done to its words, including aim and txting.

many online dictionaries offer audio verions of the words, so one can learn how to pronounce them properly.
[User Picture]
From:[info]insaint
Date:October 13th, 2006 - 07:44 pm
(Link)
That poll should have a few negative ratings.
From:[info]lyght
Date:October 13th, 2006 - 07:47 pm
(Link)
All SoundSpel would really do is serve to enshrine one specific American accent as "American English." There is far more diversity in pronunciation throughout the country than can be encompassed in a single sound-based writing system. So instead of privileging the knowledge of how to spell words that no longer sound the way they look, a certain accent would be privileged instead.

And here I thought that sociolinguistics class would ever come up in my post-college life....
[User Picture]
From:[info]neitherday
Date:October 13th, 2006 - 07:59 pm
(Link)
That is definitely a valid complaint. I noticed it myself when using it, as some of the SoundSpel spellings were different than my pronunciations. But, I still think it a vast improvement over the chaotic spelling system we have now.
[User Picture]
From:[info]lovecraftienne
Date:October 13th, 2006 - 09:21 pm
(Link)
What They Said.*

* Excuse the singular third person usage; gender is unclear and irrelevant.
[User Picture]
From:[info]elainegrey
Date:October 13th, 2006 - 09:29 pm
(Link)
Another vote for this response.
From:[info]electricube
Date:October 13th, 2006 - 10:01 pm
(Link)
My brain that is very good at storing and retrieving the spellings of words. When I'm reading, I don't hear any of the words in my head. I detect the meaning from the familiar spelling and proceed. I read at a relatively high rate of speed. I don't have the kind of brain that would substitute a phonetic spelling for a word as I write. I find it amusing when I see a word misspelled as a homophone, since the mistake is not one I would make. It seems like a joke, as though one would have to do that deliberately.

I do not mentally organize the meanings of words by their sounds, but by their spelling. When I am reading, two words that are spelled similarly are much more likely to attract my attention than two words that sound similarly. Etymology comes very naturally to me, since, to me, the spelling of the word is what identifies the word and gives it its meaning.

I am a musician; perhaps one explanation is that I experience sounds (words) as without specific meanings. While music is emotionally evocative and meaningful, in my mind, sounds correspond to visual symbols only incidentally. Another note of interest is that I picked up sign language very quickly. Like my experience of the written word, sign language is a system that involves immediate translation of visual symbols to meaning, without an audio component.
[User Picture]
From:[info]darquis
Date:October 14th, 2006 - 07:08 am
(Link)
Pretty much same here. I'm a pretty visual person; I can read so fast precisely because I don't sound out words in my head, unless I've never seen the word in question before. Phonetic spelling in any language I know annoys me to no end.
[User Picture]
From:[info]thethirdvoice
Date:November 17th, 2006 - 12:49 pm
(Link)
Never learned to read by sounding words out, so this is weird & slow to read, but I can see the advantage for people starting to read.
[User Picture]
From:[info]invalid_userid
Date:October 14th, 2006 - 01:11 pm
(Link)
reading that gave me a headache. maybe i could learn to read it, but it was weird.
From:[info]electricube
Date:October 16th, 2006 - 04:41 pm
(Link)
Another comment I want to make is that this practice forced me to 'decode' the meaning of words THROUGH their sounds. I could not immediately deduce the meaning of the phonetically-spelled 'words', so I had to mentally 'play' the sound of each word in order to decode its meaning. Decoding meaning from sound is a tedious, time-consuming extra step, and is not typically part of my reading experience.
[User Picture]
From:[info]neitherday
Date:August 29th, 2007 - 10:33 pm
(Link)
While a major advantage of SoundSpel is that it can be decoded by sounding it out — if SoundSpel spellings were standard for a long enough period of time, it could be decoded in the same way you decode standard spelling. Reading it is only awkward because it's not what we're used to.