| Gliese 581c Thoughts
|
| Date and Time |
- | May. 2nd, 2007, 11:00 am | |
| Current Mood |
- | blank | |
| Current Music |
- | budgies gurgling | |
|
Gliese 581c brings up the tidal lock issue: if Gliese 581c is tidally locked to Gliese 581 then one side of the planet would be scorched while the other would be frozen, rendering the planet uninhabitable for water-dependant life. Most of the planets detected so far (including Gliese 581c) have been only detected through indirect measurements of their mass, we no nothing of the structure of that mass. It is possible at least some of these are double planets. Though perhaps unlikely — if Gliese 581c is a double planet, both planets might be tidally lock to each other instead of the star similar to the situation in Asimov's Nemesis, allowing for liquid water and possibly water-dependant life. The possibility of life on Gliese 581c brings up something that has been a bit of a minor mental obsession of mine: life that has evolved vision is likely to evolve vision keyed to the spectra of light it most often encounters. Life evolving around a red dwarf would not likely see the same spectra of light we see. Blue would be of little use and their visual range would probably be shifted into the infrared. Something printed red-on-white or blue-on-black in our eyes might simply look like a blank page to such a life form and their chosen inks may be only visible in the near-infrared and be invisible to us. Perceptual differences such as that would serve to further complicate communications with intelligent extraterrestrial life. It is easy to assume our perception of light and sound and smell and feel is the default, because within humanity we consider anything outside of that default a disorder. Our bias is sample bias, and other intelligent life in the universe is likely to perceive things in vastly different ways than we can even imagine. |
|
|
|
| Comments: |
Have you read Doc Smith? Sorry, Edward E. Smith, PhD?
I recommend him highly, especially the Lensmen series. Granted, his prose will leave you picking bits of wood pulp out of your teeth between chapters. His views on women, while no doubt forward-thinking for his time, are painfully quaint by today's standards. His male characters are, at times, blatantly Marty Stuish. But I still recommend him -- sci-fi as it exists today owes him a huge debt. (So does food science. I'm told we can thank him for the powdered donut.) George Lucas "borrowed" a lot of ideas from Doc Smith, and didn't execute them half as well.
Among other things, he explores alien life, from planets with conditions very different from those of Earth, and he touches upon their senses. At least one of his species uses X-rays to see, if I remember correctly.
I have not read, but sounds like something to check out next time I'm at the library. | |