| Meeting the Message
|
| Date and
Time |
- | Aug. 13th, 2007, 03:12 pm | |
| Current Mood |
- | calm | |
| Current Music |
- | Squirrel Nut Zippers - Hell | |
|
In the United States, the Republicans often complain that sex scandals involving Democrats don't tend to have the same level of fallout as ones involving Republicans. In fact, sex scandals involving Democrats sometimes end up burning Republicans who make political hay out of it. Liberals, on the other hand, dislike the joy right wingers find in accusing the left of being intolerant of Christianity, even though many members of the right have no problem being intolerant of religions outside their own.
Pro-abstinence Republicans are more vulnerable to sexual misconduct scandals because it directly contradicts their message of morality, liberals are far more vulnerable to accusations of intolerance because it contradicts their message. For the most part, the hardline right makes little claim of tolerance and the hardline left makes little claim of sexual chastity. The double standard in both of those cases is due to a general dislike of hypocrisy throughout the political spectrum.
The message is: keep true to your message or adapt your message to what you really mean.
|
|
|
|
| Comments: |
sex scandals involving Democrats sometimes end up burning Republicans who make political hay out of it.
Example?
The double standard in both of those cases is due to a general dislike of hypocrisy throughout the political spectrum.
Example?
(I can't think of any for either, perhaps I don't know what you meant.)
I can answer both with one example:
Bill Clinton was largely forgive for the Monica Lewinsky scandal; however shortly after the Lewinsky scandal, similar sex scandals brought down several key Republicans in the House who had attacked Clinton – due in large part to their apparent hypocrisy. | |
grrr HTML...