Eyes Ever Opening - Banning Interest Searches [entries|archive|tags|friends|userinfo]
The Madwoman of Menotomy
[ website | neitherday.com ]
[ journey | spirituality, madness, travel]
[ opinion | politics, psychiatry, religion, polls]
[ read | poetry, stream]
[ see | the madwoman, art, photography]
[ hear | voice posts]
[ free stuff | backgrounds, icons, mood themes, wallpapers]

Banning Interest Searches

neitherday
Date and Time  - Dec. 7th, 2007, 09:07 pm

Previous Entry Add to Memories Tell a Friend Next Entry
Current Mood  - pissed off pissed off
Current Music  - budgies and tiels in conference

So much for hoping things were going to get better under SUP. They've now started censoring what interests can be searched for. What is more, interests such as "spicy food" are no longer searchable simply because they happen to contain a banned string. Forget trying to find a community discussing the Armenian genocide. What the hell?!?!

LinkLeave a comment

Comments:
[User Picture]
From:[info]disclaim__her
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 02:12 am
(Link)
Wtf?? I am about fed up with all this crap....
[User Picture]
From:[info]butterflysnf
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 02:20 am
(Link)
LOL
I guess no more spicy food for us then ;)
[User Picture]
From:[info]lavendertattoo
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 02:21 am
(Link)
Oh man, this is getting downright scary.
[User Picture]
From:[info]emthefrootloop
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 02:34 am
(Link)
How bizzare. I wonder if anyone is planning on making an official statement about it. Although they will probably just deny it all.
[User Picture]
From:[info]khep
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 03:47 am
(Link)
What the fuck??
Oh! :o am I allowed to say that?

Grr!
[User Picture]
From:[info]catskillmarina
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 03:56 am
(Link)
I don't know how much of a choice they really have. Censorship is filtering
through society companies are choosing to censor themselves ahead of the
terms that they fear will be dictated to them by government.

Call us insane but i think it is getting that bad.

--- Miri of Mtribe
[User Picture]
From:[info]azurelunatic
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 05:25 am
(Link)
That's not new. That's been around since, IIRC, shortly post-Strikethrough.
[User Picture]
From:[info]neitherday
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 05:40 am
(Link)
I just read that. Odd how there was never an announcement. If this is SA's mess, maybe, hopefully, SUP will clean it up.
[User Picture]
From:[info]azurelunatic
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 02:44 pm
(Link)
I know there's not an announcement on a lot of quiet back-end stuff. There was an anti-serial-adder rate limiting on friend addition that peeved one of my friends who runs an LJ-based RPG. I can't recall that the rate limiting was ever officially announced, and when I asked an engineer about what the exact limit was, he politely declined to tell me. (And I am OK with that, actually.)

Her RPG is locked down since scary Nazi fanboys were finding it through searching for the interests of the villains (and not reading the part where the journals were of fictional characters for the RPG) and friending them and being all icky, so she locked all the character journals down to friends-only. There are a lot of character journals. Now, every time a new character is created, it has to add all the journals in the game so everyone can interact. So of course she ran afoul of the rate limiting. I imagine she will have got fewer crazed neonazi stalkers to the RPG after they added the interest search restrictions, although she changed all the character interests around the time of Strikethrough to make them a little more obviously fictional.
[User Picture]
From:[info]neitherday
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 03:29 pm
(Link)
Even if this wasn't deemed important enough for a [info]news or [info]lj_biz post, it should have at least been mentioned in [info]lj_releases. Not mentioning it there seems almost a deliberate attempt to obscure the change.

One of my interests is unsearchable under this scheme, "raccoons". I understand there may be a legal and ethical need to block people from searching for child pornography – but the scope, poor implementation, and lack of communication of this "feature" are ridiculous.

This is SA's mess and SUP's first real test in their new role.

Edited at 2007-12-08 03:31 pm (UTC)
[User Picture]
From:[info]azurelunatic
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 03:34 pm
(Link)
It is poorly implemented. It also blocks searches on some reclaimed terms -- someone tried searching for "fag hags" and was denied.
[User Picture]
From:[info]catskillmarina
Date:December 8th, 2007 - 04:13 pm
(Link)
If *i* were called upon as a programmer to implement censorship i would do it
the way it has been done here. I would rather it be visible and annoying than
transparent ....Of course i would most likely loose my job over it by saying

"This interest has been censored in the fear that the newly formed but secret
comittee for public decency will shut us down for allowing controvertial
interests."

in the return messages.

--- Marina of Mtribe
[User Picture]
From:[info]hurricanecarol
Date:December 10th, 2007 - 01:27 am
(Link)
This is just sad. Of course most of these filters are more over-zealous than a Pat Robertson groupie. Spicy food? c'mon!

As an interesting aside, I ran afoul of the pornography filters at work when trying to show my friend some of the oddball domestic pigeons that people breed. It allowed me to show him the Jacobins, the Giant Runt and a few others, but it gagged on the Pouter Pigeon. I kept expecting security to show up at my desk and envisioned trying to explain to them that the word "pigeon" was not a polite euphemism for something I shouldn't be looking up at work. And that yes, I really was just spending my lunch hour showing a friend silly pigeon pictures. Figured security would be nudging and winking the whole time I was explaining this...

Scary...